<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CAPTCHA Alternative? Try this Invisible Human Check for Web Form Validation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/javascript/human-form-validation-check-trick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/javascript/human-form-validation-check-trick/</link>
	<description>Your complete web design guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:36:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Hunt</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/javascript/human-form-validation-check-trick/#comment-22661</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22661</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have a live example of this script they can share with Dale?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have a live example of this script they can share with Dale?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/javascript/human-form-validation-check-trick/#comment-22533</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22533</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m interested in using this on my forms and I understand where to place the no script tag but I&#039;m not sure what to name the external java script file or how to activate from my form. A little clarity for the noobs would be greatly appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m interested in using this on my forms and I understand where to place the no script tag but I&#8217;m not sure what to name the external java script file or how to activate from my form. A little clarity for the noobs would be greatly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Search Of The Perfect CAPTCHA &#171; Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/javascript/human-form-validation-check-trick/#comment-21682</link>
		<dc:creator>In Search Of The Perfect CAPTCHA &#171; Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 04:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-21682</guid>
		<description>[...] can be used to fill in hidden fields dynamically, which server-side validation can check for. Scratchmedia provides an example of this hidden field solution, along with an alternative CAPTCHA if JavaScript [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can be used to fill in hidden fields dynamically, which server-side validation can check for. Scratchmedia provides an example of this hidden field solution, along with an alternative CAPTCHA if JavaScript [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Behnam hassanpour</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/javascript/human-form-validation-check-trick/#comment-21398</link>
		<dc:creator>Behnam hassanpour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 05:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-21398</guid>
		<description>All spambots looking for an exact field name if we send random elemens name maybe we could stop them.
For example a bot is sensitive to email field name if we send a randum name instead of &quot;mail&quot; to user browser we can stop bots .Ofcours our script must be genus to detect submited forms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All spambots looking for an exact field name if we send random elemens name maybe we could stop them.<br />
For example a bot is sensitive to email field name if we send a randum name instead of &#8220;mail&#8221; to user browser we can stop bots .Ofcours our script must be genus to detect submited forms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benny</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/javascript/human-form-validation-check-trick/#comment-20391</link>
		<dc:creator>benny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 09:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20391</guid>
		<description>You can use foreign words, not English. Or English with some variants, e.g. Whatisonepluseight? Writethewordhuman. etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can use foreign words, not English. Or English with some variants, e.g. Whatisonepluseight? Writethewordhuman. etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/javascript/human-form-validation-check-trick/#comment-18739</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 04:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18739</guid>
		<description>Many spambots will still get stopped by this method all the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many spambots will still get stopped by this method all the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Ivey</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/javascript/human-form-validation-check-trick/#comment-15507</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Ivey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15507</guid>
		<description>I agree with the need for a better human interactive proof - but it has to be something that&#039;s easy to incorporate into any existing architecture with a minimum of coding.  My company just released a new technology with a different approach, called VouchSafe, and I&#039;d be interested in your comments, (http://www.vouchsafe.com). Is it intuitive enough?  Does making the user experience better add enough value to make it worthwhile for websites to switch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the need for a better human interactive proof &#8211; but it has to be something that&#8217;s easy to incorporate into any existing architecture with a minimum of coding.  My company just released a new technology with a different approach, called VouchSafe, and I&#8217;d be interested in your comments, (<a href="http://www.vouchsafe.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.vouchsafe.com</a>). Is it intuitive enough?  Does making the user experience better add enough value to make it worthwhile for websites to switch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen Neely</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/javascript/human-form-validation-check-trick/#comment-14780</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen Neely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14780</guid>
		<description>Nice example, but I think another method to protect your form would be to check on the server side that the values are indeed coming from your form. I&#039;ve seen people post data from a different form trying to brake the application.

Nice article BTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice example, but I think another method to protect your form would be to check on the server side that the values are indeed coming from your form. I&#8217;ve seen people post data from a different form trying to brake the application.</p>
<p>Nice article BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herrin</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/javascript/human-form-validation-check-trick/#comment-13139</link>
		<dc:creator>Herrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 10:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13139</guid>
		<description>And what about all the human spam going on at the moment? Is captcha or this solution going to stop them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what about all the human spam going on at the moment? Is captcha or this solution going to stop them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calin</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/javascript/human-form-validation-check-trick/#comment-11900</link>
		<dc:creator>Calin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11900</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like captcha, but let&#039;s admit that with today&#039;s spammers, it&#039;s a strong solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like captcha, but let&#8217;s admit that with today&#8217;s spammers, it&#8217;s a strong solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

